Skip to main content

Should apartments and offices be built on prime agriculture?

Picture clicked by Nandini Soondram

Prime agricultural land is the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops. While we may argue that the vast expanse of land should be exploited for infrastructural usage and hence to boost the economic machineries, its preservation for ecological sustainability is primordial. For this contentious issue entails both positive and negative corollaries, an in-depth diagnosis would be required to strike a consensus.

To start with, taking care of millions of people who are starving is more important than saving natural resources, most of which are renewable anyway. We cannot expect developing nations such as Guinea and Togo to share the green concerns of developed countries when they are faced with dire poverty and a constant battle for survival. Moreover, if it is argued that agricultural land can be further developed to build a long-term business in the world facing famine and food crisis, often, these same lands are at risks of natural calamities, polluted water which leads to crop failures, climate change that can ultimately turn fertile fields into desert and flood coastal areas where hundreds of millions live. Developing countries have to choose apartments and offices if they want a future for their people.

As it is, economic development is vital for meeting the basic needs of the growing populations of developing countries. If we do not allow them to industrialize, these nations will not survive in the ferociously competitive economic world. And with evolving demographics, more space is naturally needed to accommodate the locals. At times, foreign direct investors cause a transhumance to a particular area, and the authorities are left with no choice than to build residential areas on the only available space.

The real issue is that we have limited resources for our unlimited wants and thus, preserving resources is tantamount to wasting them. India, for instance, despite having 60.3 % of arable agricultural land, felt the need to postulate ambitious diversification of its economy and went to create technological, entertainment and industrial pillars. It is important to not only concentrate on prime agriculture and attempt to integrate with the world map of global macro-economies. In so doing, the scenery of a country is changed and becomes fit of globalization. The upcoming generations are more open to the world and apt to become a global citizen as they are presented with an array of opportunities. Bringing forth offices means that the populace is boosted to adopt a white-collar lifestyle and hence education of children is emphasized and encouraged.

On the other hand, whilst living with the flow of present economic process, as a society, we cannot trivialize the ecological processes that are the very basis of a living planet. Ecologies are foundational and the loss of prime of agricultural land also means the loss of an important biodiversity which is not being conserved for future generations. The failure to understand this is one of the consequences of being drawn deeply into the economic designs that seem to more directly impact the safety and comfort of our home. No one wants to stop economic progress that could give millions better lives. But we must insist on sustainable development that combines environmental care, social justice and economic growth. Earth cannot support unrestricted growth. Companies in developed countries already have higher costs of production because of rules to protect the environment. 

And if all prime agricultural land was to be replaced by apartments and offices, what would happen to our lives stocks? As such, solutions need to be found. Dennis Weaver’s ‘ecolonomical’ approach is a good starting point. Managing the available resources too, by an effective cohabitation of agriculture and infrastructure would be highly recommended. Several buildings in Singapore, for example, all the while accommodating a high population for its restricted land availability as consumers to drive its economy, also take care of cultivating plants and green spaces on their roof top through hydroponic gardens and greenhouses. As a matter of fact even, barren and infertile land may be used instead for infrastructural purposes and in extreme situations, the transplantation of the cultivation is also reliable.


Therefore, it is important to maintain natural resources in ways that are economically sound.

Popular posts from this blog

If a guy stares at you for a long time while smiling does he like you?

There's this guy at my work who I've been starting to get to know better, and I've noticed that every time he sees me he always gets this big smile on his face and he stares at me all the time. He has this look in his eyes that I can't really explain but it seems like he's fascinated or dreamy. Plus I'll be doing something and I'll look over at him and catch him looking right over at me, and he just smiles and I smile back. Today as he was leaving work I saw him from a distance but I didn't say anything because I wasn't going to shout across the parking lot, and he just developed this big smile while looking right at me, and I couldn't help but smile too. Then he came over and we talked a little before he left (he seemed nervous and he's kind of dorky, but I think it's cute) I don't know, I just feel like he stares at me just a little longer than any other person. I was wondering if this could mean he likes me?

Comparing the lifestyles of celebrities and ordinary people

Disney’s TV Show Hannah Montana depicts the female protagonist’s choice of leading an ordinary life despite being a celebrity. The show fluidly walks us through the distinct lifestyles of a celebrity and that of an ordinary person in terms of their set of values, ways of life, activities and attitudes. Whether celebrities and ordinary people are truly different would require a close diagnostic. The first thing that comes to mind when discussing celebrity and common man’s lifestyles is luxury . From the sports industry to the entertainment industry, from politicians to business tycoons, the mantra “if you’ve got it, flaunt it” seems to be painted all over the walls that frame celebrity life. Because of the power and extraordinary amount of wealth they have, celebrities live a life that the normal man can only dream of. For instance, with real-estate assets worth more than just a few million dollars across the world, celebrities have better vacation options than an ordinary

Because being honest and being frank are two poles apart!

   *I have been meaning to write this since 3 weeks now.* I wonder why people take it for granted that they can do anything to you and say anything to you! Honestly, how can people be that honest?! I don't get it! Now, just so that I get over this- we had rather just start! , I think that each one of us has been frank at least once in our life!  Frankness broadcasts itself as a means for people to soothe their inability to contain their comments.  Because want it or not- Frankness in comparison to honesty is a bad thing. Basically because being frank hurts the object and makes the subject feel good, whilst honesty-well honesty is good for both! Being frank is a stupendo fantabulously fantastic thing for many of us. It's been for me. Mainly because it allowed me to believe that I existed and it made me feel good- it made me feel good because I could put my opinions forward. But to be honest, I don't it's been the best thing to do!  Frankness hurt