Skip to main content

It would be a mistake for education in the technological age to ignore the Humanities. Discuss.


Since humans have been able, we have used philosophy, literature, religion, art, music, history and language to understand and record our world and its people. Rightly so, the humanities can be described as the study of how people process and document the human experience. However, higher education is stuffed with overpaid administrators squeezing every ounce of efficiency out of lecturers and focusing on the ‘profitable’ areas of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. The humanities could be at risk of being wiped out and this, for no plausible reasons.

Politicians and corporates at times claim that the humanities do not matter and ironically by no coincidence, they are the same people who think of us only as workers and consumers, not as citizens or individuals. It is the wealthy who insist that we should seek only to work: we don’t need the humanities, they tell us, all we need is to labour in a marketplace that will enrich them, not us. Liberal arts degrees have not been traditionally valued in China and we can see evidence of this in the lack of Chinese creativity in all domains. According to research, only 10% of Chinese college graduates are deemed employable by multinational businesses. The main complaint? They are too regimented, predictable and lack the creative spark. Thus, only short-sighted politicians or corporates would seek to challenge the inclusion of the Humanities in the school curriculum.

Irritably, there is a categorical error taking place in the government’s vision of the humanities as impracticable and unprofitable, elitist and outdated. Investing in the humanities should be seen as infrastructure. It is after all not a balance-sheet equation where if one puts in this much one will get that much out, but if one is teaching people to be articulate, if one is teaching people about our own lives, our own meanings; they embrace thinking curiosity, creation, psychology and emotion. Hence, if we diminish that, we will all be the poorer and I really do think you can put that in ‘value’ terms.
At the dawn of the 21st century, there is ample evidence to show how the Humanities have helped concoct the world we live in today. The humanities helped us understand each other’s languages, histories and cultures all the while fostering social justice and equality that gave rise to movements like the Suffragette and the LGBT community. They revealed how people have tried to make moral, spiritual and intellectual sense of the world; for instance, the Egyptians. They teach us to deal critically and logically with subjective, complex, imperfect information as well as to weigh evidence skeptically and consider more than one side of every question. Humanities students build skills in writing and critical reading, are inspired by some of the greatest minds and thoughts of the ages and become informed and critical citizens. Would democracy have flourished, had it not been for the humanities?
The humanities are the study of what makes us human, of what it means to be human. Literature, history, art, music, languages, theatre, film – and yes, television and computer games – are the stories and ideas through which we express our humanity. If we agree that the humanities do not matter, or fail to challenge this assessment, we are colluding in the very practices that reduce our humanity, that impinge upon all the other ways in which we can enrich our lives, our abilities to express our creative individuality. How can we sustain our civilisation if we don’t understand how it works or fail to respect it? 

There is a story that may be apocryphal but is illustrative. Supposedly, Richard Dawkins was once visiting an art gallery in Florence, and as he left was heard to ask, “But what’s all this art for?” This question articulates a widely held view among the instrumentalists and technocrats who decide our society’s priorities as being purely natural science, entrepreneurship and sports- oriented. Last year it was revealed that scientific studies had “proven” that reading made people more empathetic. At last, some book lovers cheered, what we always knew has been proven: book lovers are better people! Let me answer the question: what’s all this art for? It’s for us.

Also, the Humanities help bring a clarity to the future. Today, humanistic knowledge continues to provide the ideal foundation for exploring and understanding the human experience. Investigating a branch of philosophy might get you thinking about ethical questions. Learning another language might help you gain an appreciation for the similarities in different cultures. Contemplating a sculpture might make you think about how an artist's life affected her creative decisions. Reading a book from another region of the world, might help you think about the meaning of democracy. Listening to a history course might help you better understand the past while at the same time offer you a clearer picture of the future.


Clearly, as a civilization, we cannot afford to lose the Humanities at the expense of so-called more lucrative subjects. The Humanities only helps us understand the story of human kind through deep analysis and ensures that we do not become monsters driven by materialistic lusts. Indeed, it would be a mistake for education in the technological age to ignore the Humanities. Extinguishing the flame of Humanities is tantamount to a war being waged within the cloistered world of academia; a war whose repercussions will be felt down through generations and only the rekindling of that lamp could save humanity from slaughtering itself.

-910 Words

Popular posts from this blog

If a guy stares at you for a long time while smiling does he like you?

There's this guy at my work who I've been starting to get to know better, and I've noticed that every time he sees me he always gets this big smile on his face and he stares at me all the time. He has this look in his eyes that I can't really explain but it seems like he's fascinated or dreamy. Plus I'll be doing something and I'll look over at him and catch him looking right over at me, and he just smiles and I smile back. Today as he was leaving work I saw him from a distance but I didn't say anything because I wasn't going to shout across the parking lot, and he just developed this big smile while looking right at me, and I couldn't help but smile too. Then he came over and we talked a little before he left (he seemed nervous and he's kind of dorky, but I think it's cute) I don't know, I just feel like he stares at me just a little longer than any other person. I was wondering if this could mean he likes me?

Comparing the lifestyles of celebrities and ordinary people

Disney’s TV Show Hannah Montana depicts the female protagonist’s choice of leading an ordinary life despite being a celebrity. The show fluidly walks us through the distinct lifestyles of a celebrity and that of an ordinary person in terms of their set of values, ways of life, activities and attitudes. Whether celebrities and ordinary people are truly different would require a close diagnostic. The first thing that comes to mind when discussing celebrity and common man’s lifestyles is luxury . From the sports industry to the entertainment industry, from politicians to business tycoons, the mantra “if you’ve got it, flaunt it” seems to be painted all over the walls that frame celebrity life. Because of the power and extraordinary amount of wealth they have, celebrities live a life that the normal man can only dream of. For instance, with real-estate assets worth more than just a few million dollars across the world, celebrities have better vacation options than an ordinary

Because being honest and being frank are two poles apart!

   *I have been meaning to write this since 3 weeks now.* I wonder why people take it for granted that they can do anything to you and say anything to you! Honestly, how can people be that honest?! I don't get it! Now, just so that I get over this- we had rather just start! , I think that each one of us has been frank at least once in our life!  Frankness broadcasts itself as a means for people to soothe their inability to contain their comments.  Because want it or not- Frankness in comparison to honesty is a bad thing. Basically because being frank hurts the object and makes the subject feel good, whilst honesty-well honesty is good for both! Being frank is a stupendo fantabulously fantastic thing for many of us. It's been for me. Mainly because it allowed me to believe that I existed and it made me feel good- it made me feel good because I could put my opinions forward. But to be honest, I don't it's been the best thing to do!  Frankness hurt